Older adults with kidney failure and frailty: two care paths gave similar results
☕ Includes a question for the family ↓
FrailtyPart of a story we are following · 4 articles · See every update
If you or someone you love is older, living with frailty, and facing kidney failure, here is something useful. A new trial found no evidence that either path, dialysis or care without dialysis, came out ahead overall. That means the choice can reflect what matters most to you.
In a trial of 445 adults in the UK with kidney failure, aged 80 or older or aged 65 to 79 with frailty or several health conditions, people who prepared for care without dialysis and people who prepared for dialysis had similar results for length and quality of life over the follow-up. It is a heavy topic. It is also one where clear information can make a hard conversation easier.
How the study worked
Researchers at 31 kidney centres across England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland randomly assigned 445 older adults to one of two plans. The trial was published in the Lancet on November 4, 2026. Because people knew which plan they were on, and only about 7% of those screened were eligible and agreed to join, the results may not describe everyone with kidney failure.
What is care without dialysis?
The trial called it “responsive management.” It is a planned, patient-centered approach. The focus is on slowing how fast the kidneys get worse, treating symptoms actively, and protecting quality of life. It does not use dialysis or a kidney transplant.
The other plan was to prepare for dialysis, a treatment that does the filtering work of the kidneys.
In both groups, the care teams prepared people ahead of time. That is the “prepare” in the trial’s name.
What they found
The researchers used a score called a quality-adjusted life-year, or QALY. It combines how long a person lives with how good their health feels, based on questionnaires the patients filled out themselves.
The average scores in the two groups were close. The dialysis group’s score was a little higher, but the gap was small enough that it could be down to chance. The researchers concluded they found no evidence that either plan was better.
Other results:
- Hospital admissions were similar in the two groups.
- Problems with dialysis access, the way a dialysis machine connects to the body, were lower in the group preparing for care without dialysis. There were 74 such events in 36 people across both groups.
- Over the follow-up, 157 of 228 people (69%) in the no-dialysis group and 136 of 217 people (63%) in the dialysis group died. These patients were older and living with serious illness.
The trial did not set out to prove that one plan beats the other. What it adds is solid, comparative information for people making this decision.
What you can do today
Take five minutes to write down what matters most to you if kidney failure is part of your life or a loved one’s. Think about time at home, staying active, avoiding hospital stays, or being comfortable. Share the list with your family, and bring it to your next kidney care appointment so your care team can build a plan around it.
Talk about it at home
Your kidneys work like a kitchen strainer: they let the water through and catch what the body does not need. In this study, scientists asked many older adults with tired kidneys to follow different care plans, and the plan each person got was decided by chance, like drawing names from a hat. Then they checked how long people lived and how good they felt, and the results were alike, so each person can choose what matters most to them.
Try it at home
Imagine the scientists had let each person pick their own plan instead of drawing names from a hat. Why might that make the comparison unfair? Talk about how chance helps make the groups alike, so we can trust what we learn.
Keep exploring
Copies this article and its questions so you can paste them into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or the AI you use, and keep the conversation going.
Questions and answers
- Did the trial show dialysis was better or worse?
- No. The researchers found no evidence that either preparing for dialysis or preparing for care without dialysis was better on the combined score of length and quality of life.
- Who was in the trial?
- 445 adults with kidney failure at 31 UK centres. They were aged 80 or older, or aged 65 to 79 with frailty or several health conditions. The median age was 82.
- What does care without dialysis include?
- A planned approach that focuses on slowing kidney decline, managing symptoms and protecting quality of life, without dialysis or a kidney transplant.
- What is a QALY?
- It is a score that combines how long someone lives with how good their health feels. Patients rated their own health with a questionnaire.
