New bladder cancer option helps people who can’t get cisplatin live longer
☕ Includes a question for the family ↓
Bladder cancerPart of a story we are following · 2 articles · See every update
If you or someone you love has bladder cancer that has grown into the bladder wall, there is encouraging news. For people who can’t take the usual chemotherapy, a new combination of drugs around surgery helped more of them stay alive.
The usual plan for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is chemotherapy with a drug called cisplatin, then surgery to remove the bladder. But many people can’t take cisplatin, or they choose not to. Until now, they had no proven treatment to add to surgery. This trial changes that.
How the study worked
The VOLGA trial followed people with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who could not or would not take cisplatin. It was a phase 3 trial, the large kind that tests a treatment against the standard approach. Chance decided which of three groups each person joined. It was published on Oct. 24, 2026, in the New England Journal of Medicine. Patients and doctors knew who got which treatment, and the drugmaker AstraZeneca paid for the trial.
- Group 1: durvalumab, an immunotherapy that helps your immune system find cancer, plus enfortumab vedotin, a drug that carries cancer-killing medicine straight to tumor cells. They got these before surgery, then durvalumab after surgery.
- Group 2: the same plan plus a second immunotherapy called tremelimumab.
- Group 3: surgery alone.
What they found
Two years after the study began, more people were alive in the first group. About 78 out of every 100 people were alive with the two-drug plan, compared with about 69 out of every 100 with surgery alone. The exact figures were 78.4% and 69.4%.
More people also stayed free of cancer coming back or getting worse. Event-free survival means being alive with no return or worsening of the cancer. About 64 out of every 100 people in the first group had that result at two years (63.5%). With surgery alone, it was about 45 out of every 100 (45.1%).
The three-drug group did better than surgery alone too. About 60 out of every 100 people were event-free at two years (60.1%).
These drugs do cause side effects. Serious side effects happened in about 71 out of every 100 people in the first group (71.1%). In the three-drug group it was about 80 out of every 100 (79.5%). With surgery alone it was about 50 out of every 100 (50.2%). Your care team can help you manage them.
What you can do today
If you or a loved one has muscle-invasive bladder cancer and can’t take cisplatin, write down one question for the next oncology visit: “Is a treatment with immunotherapy around surgery an option for me?” Bring that question to the appointment.
Talk about it at home
Some people with bladder cancer can’t take the usual medicine before surgery. Scientists tried two new medicines instead. One helps the body’s defenders spot the cancer. The other carries medicine right to the cancer. After two years, more people who got the new plan were still alive.
Question for the table
How do you think the scientists knew the new plan was the reason? Why do you think they used chance to decide who got which treatment?
Keep exploring
Copies this article and its questions so you can paste them into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or the AI you use, and keep the conversation going.
Questions and answers
- Who was this trial for?
- People with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who could not take cisplatin chemotherapy or chose not to.
- Did the new treatment help people live longer?
- Yes. At two years, 78.4% of people on durvalumab plus enfortumab vedotin were alive, compared with 69.4% who had surgery alone.
- Did the treatment cause side effects?
- Yes. Serious side effects were more common with the drugs: 71.1% in the two-drug group, compared with 50.2% with surgery alone.
- What is muscle-invasive bladder cancer?
- It is bladder cancer that has grown into the muscle wall of the bladder. The usual treatment is surgery to remove the bladder.
